Inter-system reconciliations – why data consistency matters more than ever

Inter-system reconciliations – why data consistency matters more than ever
6:05

Inter-system reconciliations refer to the process of comparing and aligning data between different internal systems – such as front-office trading platforms, middle-office risk systems, and back-office settlement engines – to ensure consistency and accuracy across the trade lifecycle. 

In today’s post-trade environment, this process is essential. Financial institutions operate across a complex web of platforms and data sources, and any discrepancies between systems can lead to failed trades, regulatory breaches, and operational inefficiencies. With increasing pressure from regulations like T+1 and CSDR (Central Securities Depositories Regulation), and the industry’s shift toward real-time processing, the need for fast, accurate, and automated reconciliations has never been greater. 

At the core of successful inter-system reconciliations is data consistency. Without consistent data flowing between systems, reconciliation breaks become inevitable, slowing down operations, increasing risk, and undermining confidence in decision-making. Here, we explore why data consistency is foundational to effective inter-system reconciliations, and how firms can future proof their operations by addressing it head-on. 

 


Inter-system reconciliations and data consistency in practice 

Data consistency isn’t just about having the same data in two places. It’s about ensuring that the data is accurate, timely, and aligned across systems, formats, and teams. Inconsistent data can manifest as mismatched trade details, missing fields, or conflicting timestamps – all of which can delay reconciliation and introduce risk. 

The consequences of inconsistent data go far beyond operational inefficiency. They can result in: 

  • Failed trades due to mismatches that aren’t caught in time 
  • Regulatory breaches from inaccurate reporting or missed deadlines 
  • Financial penalties under regimes like CSDR 
  • Reputational damage when clients or regulators lose confidence in your data 
  • Lost productivity as teams spend hours manually resolving breaks 

Without consistency, automation fails, timelines slip, and compliance risks escalate. In a world moving toward real-time processing and tighter regulatory timelines, firms simply can’t afford to let inconsistent data undermine their reconciliation workflows. 

The complexity of modern financial systems 

Today, financial institutions operate with a myriad of systems, from legacy, third-party platforms, and custom internal tools – many of which have been in place for decades, holding years of historical data, built on outdated architectures that weren’t designed to communicate with one another. As a result, data flows through a fragmented maze from trade execution to settlement, with each system applying its own logic, format, and timing. 

This complexity creates serious operational pain: 

  • Data fragmentation which leads to inconsistent views of the same transaction. 
  • Mismatches that arise from incompatible reference data, differing field structures, or outdated taxonomies. 
  • Delays from batch processing and manual data enrichment slow down reconciliation timelines. 
  • Manual interventions become the norm, draining team resources and increasing the risk of human error. 

The impact of this is felt within teams as waste hours chasing down breaks, morale suffers as staff are stuck in repetitive tasks, and productivity drops as skilled employees are pulled away from strategic work. Meanwhile, the cost of maintaining legacy infrastructure and resolving reconciliation issues continues to climb.  

A global investment bank working with Xceptor faced these challenges head-on. With multiple reconciliation platforms in place, the firm struggled with inefficiencies, manual processes, and inconsistent data across systems. By consolidating these onto Xceptor’s enterprise-scale platform, they were able to automate over 80% of previously manual reconciliations, validate data across formats like XML and JSON, and reduce reconciliation setup time by up to 75%. The result: improved data integrity, faster exception resolution, and significant cost savings. 

The importance of inter-system reconciliations

Achieving timely and accurate inter-system reconciliations might be a challenge but one that must be overcome. The urgency to do so is being further driven by several industry shifts that are reshaping how financial institutions operate: 

  • Regulatory pressures such as T+1 and CSDR penalties are compressing reconciliation timelines, meaning firms must now reconcile faster and with greater accuracy to avoid fines, failed trades, and compliance breaches. 
  • The shift toward real-time operations and straight-through processing (STP) means firms can no longer afford delays, manual breaks, and batch-based reconciliation processes.  
  • The cost of getting it wrong is steep. From failed trades and financial penalties to reputational damage, inconsistent or delayed reconciliations is too risky.  

In this context, reconciliation is no longer a control function tucked away in the back office, it’s a strategic enabler of operational resilience, regulatory compliance, and competitive advantage.  

Firms that can reconcile quickly and accurately across systems are better positioned to respond to market changes, meet regulatory demands, and deliver a seamless client experience. 

Best practices for future-proofing reconciliations

To build resilient, scalable reconciliation workflows, firms should consider implementing these best practices: 

  • Invest in data quality and governance to ensure consistency at the source. 
  • Prioritise timely data availability to support real-time decision-making. 
  • Real-time reconciliations over batch processing wherever possible. 
  • Ensure audit compliance with transparent, traceable workflows. 
  • Break down silos between teams and systems to enable seamless data flow. 
  • Automate intelligently – focus on exception-based processing, not blanket automation. 
  • Monitor exceptions proactively to catch issues before they escalate. 

These steps not only help to improve operational efficiency but also better position firms with the ability to adapt to future regulatory and market changes. 

Ready to transform your inter-system reconciliations?

Explore how Xceptor can help you streamline inter-system reconciliations with intelligent automation and data consistency at the core. 

Found this article useful?

Share it with someone!